Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 09:46

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Knicks get Jay Wright clarity in their head coach search - New York Post
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Chase Sapphire Reserve’s Annual Fee Is Increasing to $795. Is It Still Worth It? - AFAR
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Scientists Solve Decades-Old Cell Biology Mystery - SciTechDaily
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why do women change that much more with age?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Nintendo Switch 2 races to record sales, driven by Mario Kart World's blockbuster debut - ABC News
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What is the dirtiest thing you have witnessed your wife do?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Is the Shia claim true that Imam Ali was born inside the Kaaba?